At least two of these

are relevant to recent reads and one confirms a suspicion of mine in reaction to a read.
Now the task is to re-view it.

Bio ~ engineering.

My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.*  After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.

[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read

NOTES:
Madhyamaka     /     Dialetheist       crazy ~  unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies

Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)

=====================   segue   ==========
W-Theory  ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism   Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
=====================   theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.

Below the Fold[!]

What if?

To pun on lede or ship we are on [!]*
C-labels or Art Young.
Ctrl F perspectivism, dimentionalism, Al Gore Rhythms.
(PR: preemptive reads?)
"due the math"

*spoiler alert[last 4 inserts]

Literally...

{Kruger Leap?  Inversal Pictures[!]}1-23-16

The Guilt Trip

No, not this analysis: the opposition to* truth and consequences.

All the judgments that the typical or rabid anti-abortion believer might attribute to the pro-choice or pro-abortion practitioner, seem to be emblematic of a belief in freedom from cause.  Could an equivalent judgement be made that they want all the social consequences from lack of such freedom? 

I know this is complicated, but such seem the hazards of putting oneself in another's shoes or rational or is it just judgement? 

Let alone transportation [!] ?

* or of?
 

Quid Pro Physics

Bohemian Gravity and Dark Matters ! !  ?

4-28-15
Pulled punches ? 
( dark matter ? )

Anticipation Project ^

Or Atlantic/Pacific ?
RIP*, or prophetic affect ? 

(~)
Actually I have pretty much already bookended or bracked this text with notes and hyperlinks.  My original inspiration was in the field of geometric religion or practices.  The source is a project in The Atlantic(1) and further deconstruction involved that magazine as well. 

(~)CAUTION:  AS UN- EMBEDDED TO BE KANTINUED [!]

Now for the prospectin' ofor conceptions?  Or mining from the lede(or ship):
"The Islamic State is no mere collection of psychopaths. It is a religious group with carefully considered beliefs, among them that it is a key agent of the coming apocalypse. Here’s what that means for its strategy—and for how to stop it."

Now may be just the right time to stop
or wind down my own parsing or~religions~key~apocalypse.* 

(~)R,R,R~[!]

* Anachronistic Reasoning?
^ work in progress(2)[!]
(2) ring E dingy~N.

(~): Scroll Click?

* un circular file ?

Para~graph Three!

Endo-terror~cism?

aka Academics ?

The point?  The esoterics of Strauss maybe the Socratics of Plato, or exoterics of Neitzsche.

Ctrl F (academic:~:academics)
:::  aka [a. FOOTNOTE JUNE 2013 PAGE TWO, b. The Daily Counter Balance , c.(J) In the begining... , (D)BoC, e. Belated Breaking News! , f. THE COUNCIL OF NICE , h. Back-Log August 19th, ("religious ghetto") , i.(G).]
:::   ? [a. Looking Back , b. "if I were dictator" , c. What's good for the goose? Goose the gander! , d. Bane(Or) Change , e. Conservative Foray (4A) ,  f. Blame to go around? , g. Will Safire Replaced by Will I ams., h. Academic Freedom , i. Framing Narratives , j. In the begining... , k. Technical Difficulties , l. The Thorn and the Lyin' , m. Running Joke , n. Let me finish? , o. We are at the table. , p.Forward (Ironically)  ]
(what the fudge?  f-j,p?)
:::   Endo-suffix?

The project  ?   The dance? 
"Esotericism is the practice, widely employed by a variety of thinkers prior to and up through the early Enlightenment, of disguising their real meaning through ellipsis, surface contradiction, dispersal of their real arguments, and the like (indeed—they were misleading casual readers about their true intentions!). The understanding that philosophers like Plato and Aristotle made use of esotericism was central to Strauss’s own project of returning to their thought as an antidote to what he called the “crisis of modernity”, since it pointed to deeper truths hidden behind the evident meaning extracted by superficial readers. It was probably also one of the sources of distrust of Strauss and his followers by other academics, since it implied that initiates into the art of esoteric interpretation had access to meanings unavailable to others." Francis Fukuyama.
Or Ecto~tonics of Aristotle?  Less than Ionic that paranormal came up in  English [?]
P.4,The Prince misquote? P.5 "undermine dogmatism" bingo~? P.6 Nietzsche Recurrance
"That latter struggle was ultimately won, and led to the triumph of the “harmonist” view, now almost universally accepted, that philosophical truth could be made compatible with and indeed supportive of modern politics. Transparency is today the name of that venerable game. Classical philosophers like Plato and Aristotle had a different view; namely, that philosophical skepticism undermined the irrational beliefs necessary to the maintenance of a political community and therefore needed to be kept under wraps. As Melzer points out, there is a large body of contemporary scholarship that actively contends that virtually no one other than a few cranks ever wrote esoterically; he performs a great service by, first, showing that the claim is empirically wrong, and second, that it is itself an historically contingent interpretation." (ibid.)
 
2-25-15 2 ~ B Kantinued ;-) R I P ? [!]
(1) a. Who Let the Dogs Out?, b. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government., c. ...what about the damage to your Presidency?, (d.) The Curve or Nuance Thing, e. Doxology.
(2)~
(3)  The Be All and End All?

Pen~ta-gone? i.e. P5
"This section of the book is wonderfully erudite and leaves no uncertainty that esotericism was indeed a major art that is now all but lost. Melzer points to four reasons for past uses of esotericism. First, it served as protection from prosecution; he notes its widespread use in totalitarian countries like the former Soviet Union and contemporary China. Second, it served to protect the political community from dangerous truths, such as philosophical skepticism about the city’s gods and traditions; third, it served a pedagogical purpose by forcing readers to engage on a deeper level; and fourth, it was used as a transitional strategy for modern writers seeking to undermine dogmatism." (ibid)
P6?  At this Platonic # I will note Aristotle's place in the Nietzschean struggle.  
Hence Fukuyama is a difficult read of Strauss and Plato who are difficult reads.

P7? "If Philosophy Between the Lines were simply a book..." (where P = par.) I might plow on[!]
@9   "Strauss’s central concern was what he called the 'crisis of modernity', where the project of using philosophical reason for practical purposes was in danger of collapse."
@12 "The recovery of the rationalist project was central to Strauss’s life work—"
Having now fully read it, I will let you decide.

Neo-changian?

Naturally Evolving Order !

2-24-15 BIN~GO[!]
A fifth dimention or shun*. See (e,r,s)

C-BIN: Neo-con Pope?  Saint maybe, you can't have a dead Pope, but it would be more convenient.
Not to mention RE:cc(card carrying; Nietzsche?)  Methane?(~)

(~) wordplay @"BIN" especially :50 mark.  Eggs in one hen?

FP here{in one}.
(egg,road, sky: a. FP4 SEPT 2014 , b. Work in Progress , c. Egg/Road/Sky* , d. Speculative Physics )
Self- anomaly
St. Maybe[!]  Rooting^ for Strauss[?]

^Pla(N)tonic(~)
*  Forward (Ironically) (S~hun~T[!])
??? 

WOW

War on Words.
Slippery Slope of Subjective/Objectivism.
Words, Math, Rationalism(~)Metaphysics?








(~) not (to) be confused
w/
Indicting the System [?]



[~] A. Anomaly of Justice?,  B.FYI  c. Anac(R)onism? Election Day! d. Local Politics, e. Dog Days, Raven Nights?
Font size denotes: MAN vis-a-vie .STATE


[Hardball 'n Rand Slide of Exceptionalism.]


[later insert & italicized @(to)]